Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

inHealth Theory journal aims to  advance knowledge in the field of health management and health sciences objectively. inHealth Theory journal contributes to science with double-blind peer-reviewed studies. Editors, authors, reviewers, publishers and readers in the inHealth Theory journal strive to ensure that all processes proceed correctly. It is iessential to pay attention to ethical principles to achieve all these goals. inHealth Theory journal accepts the ethical principles set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is supported by our journal. All stakeholders in the inHealth Theory journal are expected to comply with the principles stated below.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

-Authors must keep records and information about their research process and be able to to provide research-related data to the editor and scientific committee when necessary.

-Authors must ensure that their work is not simultaneously submitted to, published in, or accepted for publication in another journal.

-People who have not contributed to the study should not be shown as authors.

-If humans or animals are used as subjects in the study, ethical permissions must be obtained.

-This should be stated if there is any conflict of interest in the study.

-Since raw data will be needed during peer review, the data used in the study should be kept for at least five years.

-If authors notice any errors during their research publication and early appearance process of their work, they should share this with the editors.

Ethical Responsibilities of the Publisher

-The publisher must be responsibility for all ethical issues including scientific abuse, fraud, plagiarism, etc.

-The publisher must empower the Editors and the editorial board to make decisions regarding the publication process.

-The publisher is responsible for keeping records of the work related to the publication process.

Ethical Responsibilities of the Editor

Ethical Responsibilities of the Reviewers